This decision concerns a motion for a directed verdict in a terrorism prosecution under section 83.18(1) of the Criminal Code.
The accused, Seth Bertrand, was alleged to have participated in or contributed to the activities of the Atomwaffen Division (AWD), a listed terrorist group, for the purpose of enhancing its ability to facilitate or carry out terrorist activity.
The court found that there was some evidence on each essential element of the offence, including the accused’s application to join AWD, his statements, and his actions, such that a properly instructed jury could convict.
The motion for a directed verdict was dismissed.