The applicant sought disclosure of a drug recognition expert's (DRE) rolling log, which documents all drug recognition evaluations conducted by the DRE.
The Crown opposed disclosure, arguing that rolling logs are clearly irrelevant and that disclosure is prohibited by section 320.36 of the Criminal Code.
The court dismissed the application, finding that the rolling log was clearly irrelevant because the DRE's opinion was corroborated by toxicological analysis.
The court also held that section 320.36 does not prohibit disclosure of rolling logs, but found disclosure unnecessary in this case due to the corroboration.
