David J. Cuming

The City of Mississauga issued a Notice of Intention to Designate the entirety of a 2.15-acre property, which included a previously designated 19th-century dwelling and newly included natural features such as a watercourse and treed valley lands.

The property owners objected, arguing that the natural features lacked cultural heritage value.

The Conservation Review Board held a hearing and concluded that the property no longer retained sufficient farm-related features to be considered a representative example of a 19th-century farmstead.

The Board recommended that the City not proceed with designating the entire property and instead maintain the existing designation protecting the historic dwelling.

The objectors challenged the City of Hamilton's Notice of Intention to Designate the property at 1 St. James Place under the Ontario Heritage Act.

They alleged procedural irregularities in the issuance of the notice and argued the property lacked cultural heritage value.

The Conservation Review Board found no procedural breaches, ruling that internal municipal procedures were outside its jurisdiction and that statutory notice requirements were met.

On the merits, the Board found the property met the criteria for design, historical, and contextual value under O. Reg. 9/06, as a rare example of 1930s experimental composite construction and its association with the Pigott Construction Company.

The Board recommended the property be designated with a revised Statement of Cultural Heritage Value.