The accused, Michael Lights, was charged with dangerous driving causing bodily harm and criminal negligence causing bodily harm following a collision.
The defense argued that the Crown had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Lights was the driver.
The court found the evidence overwhelming that Lights was the driver, based on witness testimony, identification via health card, and consistent descriptions.
The court then applied the legal principles for dangerous driving and criminal negligence, finding that Lights' conduct—speeding through a red light with non-functional lights, low brake pads, and bald tires on wet roads—constituted a marked departure from the standard of a reasonably prudent driver and demonstrated wanton disregard for the safety of others.
Lights was found guilty on all four counts.
