The accused was charged with conspiracy to commit trafficking in cocaine.
An undercover police officer testified that he met the accused at a bar, requested cocaine, and the accused made a phone call and arranged for a co-conspirator to deliver the drug.
The defence argued insufficient evidence of an agreement.
The court found that while there was no direct evidence of an agreement, the circumstantial evidence—including the accused's statement that "nothing comes through this place without me knowing" his phone call to arrange the delivery, and his approach to the vehicle before the transaction—established beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused and the co-conspirator had agreed to traffic in cocaine.
The accused was convicted.
