Brenda Khes

The applicant appealed the City of Hamilton's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit a stacked townhouse development.

The parties reached a settlement for a revised proposal of 22 units in three four-storey townhouse blocks.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised applications consistent with provincial policies and good land use planning.

The appeals were allowed in part to give effect to the settlement.

The applicant appealed the County of Brant's failure to make a decision on applications for a zoning by-law amendment and plan of subdivision to permit a residential development.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

Based on the uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed planning instruments were consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conformed to the Growth Plan and the County's Official Plan, and represented good land use planning.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part and approved the zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision.

The applicant appealed the County of Brant's failure to make a decision on applications for a zoning by-law amendment and plan of subdivision to permit a residential development.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed planning instruments were consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conformed to the Growth Plan and the County's Official Plan, and represented good land use planning.

The appeals were allowed in part to implement the settlement.

The applicants appealed the City of Hamilton's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 25-storey mixed-use development.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement modifying the design to improve transition and landscaping.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed amendments consistent with provincial policies and the municipal official plan, and allowed the appeal in part to approve the settlement.