The appellant was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of his wife.
The Crown's case was circumstantial, alleging the appellant raped and murdered the deceased.
On appeal, the appellant argued the verdict was unreasonable based on medical evidence regarding the time of death, and challenged the admissibility of expert evidence concerning genital injuries and a blood letter written in Chinese characters.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the verdict was reasonable as the medical evidence did not exonerate the appellant, and the expert evidence was properly admitted.
