3 total
The offender received six months in jail for biting off the victim's finger tip.
The offender, Enoch Villanueva, was found guilty of aggravated assault for biting off the tip of the victim's finger during an altercation.
The court considered sentencing principles, aggravating factors (violence, permanent disfigurement, ongoing victim impact, offender reigniting the fight, and returning to the scene), and mitigating factors (family support, expressed remorse, no prior criminal record).
The court rejected the defence's request for a 90-day intermittent sentence, finding it insufficient for denunciation and deterrence given the severity and lasting impact of the injury.
The Crown sought 8-9 months.
The court imposed a sentence of 6 months jail, followed by 2 years probation with conditions including anger management, a DNA order, a 10-year weapons prohibition, and a no-contact order with the victim during custody.
Leave to appeal CCAA plan sanction order denied where unsecured creditor failed to show serious and arguable grounds.
Randy Oram, an unsecured creditor and shareholder, sought leave to appeal an order sanctioning a secured-creditor-led plan of arrangement under the CCAA and a related vesting order.
The plan involved selling the debtor companies' assets to a new company owned by an affiliate of a secured creditor, leaving no recovery for unsecured creditors.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding no serious and arguable grounds.
The court held that a plan exclusively benefiting secured creditors and not continuing the debtor as a going concern is not necessarily contrary to the CCAA, especially where there is no equity for unsecured creditors and no viable alternative plan.
Request to transfer a CCAA leave to appeal motion to a full panel dismissed.
In the context of CCAA proceedings, the responding parties requested that a motion for leave to appeal be transferred from a single judge to a panel of the Court of Appeal pursuant to s. 7(4) of the Courts of Justice Act.
The single judge dismissed the request, finding that s. 13 of the CCAA provides the moving party with the procedural option of bringing a leave motion to a single judge, and there was no reason to compel the moving party to adopt a different procedure.