The appellant was convicted of conspiracy to export ecstasy into the United States and sentenced to six years' imprisonment.
He appealed both the conviction and sentence.
The appellant argued that the trial judge erred in assessing the credibility and corroboration of a co-conspirator who testified for the Crown after receiving a reduced sentence in the U.S. The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's assessment of the evidence, including recorded phone calls that demonstrated the appellant's involvement.
The court also upheld the six-year sentence, noting the large quantity of drugs and the appellant's use of a courier to take the cross-border risk.
The appeals were dismissed.
