The court addressed multiple motions, primarily the Ellison Defendant's motion for leave to examine non-parties and various motions to quash summonses issued by the Ellison Defendant.
The court denied the Ellison Defendant's request for leave, finding that the proposed witnesses lacked relevant evidence and that the examinations would constitute an abuse of process as the information was already available.
Additionally, Crown immunity prevented compelling testimony from Ministry of the Attorney General employees.
The summonses issued by the Ellison Defendant were quashed.
