The accused was charged with three counts of trafficking crack cocaine under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and three counts of possession of proceeds of crime under the Criminal Code arising from controlled purchases conducted by an undercover officer over three consecutive days.
The defence argued that the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was the individual known as “Cinderella” who sold the drugs, pointing to several investigative deficiencies including failure to preserve buy money and failure to conduct a lineup.
The court rejected these arguments, finding the surveillance evidence, photographs, and continuity of observation established identification beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court also accepted the evidence of the undercover officer regarding the drug transactions and proceeds.
Convictions were entered on all trafficking and proceeds of crime counts.