The appellants were convicted of fraud over $5,000 and public mischief in relation to a scheme to defraud an insurer by falsely reporting a truck as stolen.
A co-accused was acquitted.
The appellants appealed, arguing the jury's verdicts were inconsistent and their convictions unreasonable.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the evidence against the appellants was much stronger than against the acquitted co-accused, and the convictions were reasonable based on the evidence.
