The United States sought the extradition of three respondents for their alleged participation in a scheme to defraud a major technology company's retail stores by manipulating point-of-sale devices.
One respondent consented to committal.
The remaining two respondents argued there was insufficient evidence of their identity and participation to justify committal.
Applying the test under section 29(1) of the Extradition Act and the standard from Ferras, the court found that a reasonable jury, properly instructed, could find both respondents guilty based on the certified record of the case, which included video surveillance, co-conspirator evidence, and loss prevention testimony.
Committal for surrender was ordered for all respondents.
