The applicant applied for bail pending his appeal of an order committing him for extradition to the United States on charges relating to child pornography and child luring.
The court found that the applicant was not a flight risk and that the public interest alone did not justify his continued detention.
However, the application for bail was dismissed because the applicant failed to raise an arguable ground of appeal from his committal order.
The court found the evidence was sufficient for committal and that subscriber information obtained without a warrant would not be excluded under s. 24(2) of the Charter.
