The applicant condominium corporation sought declarations that the respondent, a former director, breached his duties under the Condominium Act and should be declared a vexatious litigant.
The respondent brought a cross-application seeking the removal of other directors and claiming oppression.
The court found that the respondent breached his duties as a director by acting unilaterally, rendering the board dysfunctional, and failing to exercise the care of a reasonably prudent person.
However, the court declined to declare him a vexatious litigant or grant a sweeping injunction against him.
The respondent's cross-application was dismissed in its entirety, as the court found no bad faith by the other directors and no breach of the respondent's reasonable expectations to support an oppression claim.