The three accused were charged with kidnapping, assault, and uttering threats against the complainant, who was suspected of having information about a high-profile missing person case.
The Crown's case relied heavily on the testimony of the complainant, who was struggling with severe drug addiction at the time of the events.
The court found the complainant's evidence to be riddled with inconsistencies, illogical claims, and memory gaps, rendering her not credible.
As the Crown failed to prove the essential elements of the offences beyond a reasonable doubt, all three accused were acquitted.
