2 total
The court dismissed a motion for an interim injunction to enforce a non-solicitation agreement due to insufficient evidence of irreparable harm.
The plaintiffs sought a temporary injunction to enforce non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements against a former shareholder, alleging breach of contract and misuse of confidential information.
The court dismissed the injunction motion, finding insufficient evidence of irreparable harm and that the balance of convenience favored the defendants.
The court noted that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate actual breach or imminent harm, and that the requested relief was an overreach that would unfairly impact the defendant's livelihood.
The court established a timetable for an urgent interim injunction motion concerning an alleged breach of a non-solicitation agreement.
The plaintiffs sought an urgent motion for an interim injunction against a former owner for alleged breach of a non-solicitation agreement.
The court, having found urgency, held a case conference to establish a timetable for the motion, emphasizing the need for a full record and encouraging settlement.
A schedule for serving motion records, responding affidavits, cross-examinations, and filing materials was set, with the motion for interim injunction returnable on June 15, 2023.
