The applicant sought to confirm the true location of the boundary between his property and the objector's property under the Boundaries Act.
The dispute centered on whether an iron bar found near the street line was in its original position.
The applicant's surveyor concluded the bar had moved and reconstructed the boundary using other evidence, including historical house ties.
The objector's surveyor argued the found bar must be held as an original monument.
The Deputy Director of Titles accepted the applicant's survey, finding that the bar was not in its original position and that the applicant's reconstruction represented the best evidence of the boundary.
