The applicant brought a motion for the sale of the matrimonial home and related relief, including disbursement of sale proceeds.
The respondent brought a cross-motion for child and spousal support, sought to set the parties' respective incomes, and requested dismissal of the sale motion.
Both parties sought orders restraining disparaging comments.
The court declined to order the sale of the matrimonial home, finding that doing so would prejudice the best interests of the child who has special needs requiring stability.
The court ordered the parties to continue sharing expenses for the home equally.
No temporary spousal support was awarded, but child support was ordered on an offset basis.
Both parties were ordered to refrain from disparaging comments and to provide complete financial disclosure.
