The appellant appealed the trial judge's decision regarding custody, pension valuation, and spousal support.
The Court of Appeal found no merit in the arguments regarding custody and pension valuation.
The court held that the spousal support order was open to the trial judge, noting the appellant could move to vary it if she failed to reach the anticipated level of self-sufficiency despite her best efforts.
The appeal was dismissed, the stay on the sale of the matrimonial home was lifted, and costs were awarded to the respondent.