The moving party sought leave to appeal a conviction and sentence related to a zoning by-law and the use of land as a seasonal camp.
The Court of Appeal denied leave, finding that the lower court decisions did not alter the scope of legal non-conforming use under s. 34(9) of the Planning Act, did not use an unreasonably broad definition of 'building', and did not prevent the continuation of the land's use as a seasonal camp.
The applications for leave to appeal were dismissed.
