1 total
Summary judgment Motion decision
This motion addressed a novel procedural question: the order of cross-examinations on a summary judgment motion where both the moving and responding parties have filed affidavits.
The court, drawing an analogy to trial procedure and emphasizing the principles of proportionality and expeditious resolution, ruled that the moving party's witnesses should be cross-examined first, followed by the responding party's deponents.
No costs were awarded due to the novelty of the issue.
