The appellant appealed orders dismissing his claims for invasion of privacy and under s. 35 of the Children's Law Reform Act, and restraining him from commencing other proceedings.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, amending the order to clarify that the dismissal of claims was without prejudice to the appellant's right to move to add the respondent as a party in the ongoing matrimonial proceeding.
The court also deleted the restraining order on consent, but upheld the motion judge's award of substantial indemnity costs.
No costs were awarded for the appeal.
