A custody and parenting dispute arose following the separation of the parties, who had two young children.
Both parents sought sole custody, alleging significant interpersonal conflict, manipulative behaviour, and communication difficulties.
The court found both parents capable and loving caregivers but determined that their conflictual relationship made a sole custody order inappropriate.
Applying best‑interests principles under the Divorce Act and Children’s Law Reform Act, and guidance from appellate authority regarding joint custody, the court concluded that joint custody was appropriate to preserve both parental relationships while maintaining stability for the children.
The children’s primary residence was ordered to remain with the respondent, with structured parenting time for the applicant.
Financial claims were largely deferred pending a full property trial, while the existing temporary child support order remained in place.