The appellants appealed three orders (Unsafe Building Order, Property Standards Order, and Occupancy Order) issued by a municipal building inspector regarding a residential property with severe structural deficiencies.
The court found the appeals of the Unsafe Building Order and Property Standards Order were out of time and declined to grant an extension, applying the Mauldin test.
The appeal of the Occupancy Order was deemed moot because the building was already vacant and subject to demolition under the other final orders.
The appellants' argument that the orders should be nullified due to an alleged warrantless inspection was rejected on both factual and legal grounds.
The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent municipality.
