Following earlier reasons concerning forfeiture of firearms and related items seized during a criminal investigation, defence counsel sought clarification and correction of the disposition of certain exhibits.
The issues included replacement of seized dynamite, correction of exhibit classifications in the forfeiture schedule, return of items characterized as silencers or flash suppressors, and return of auxiliary equipment and personal property.
The court held that although generally functus officio after issuing its reasons, it retained jurisdiction to correct accidental slips or omissions in the schedule.
The court amended the schedule to correct the classification of certain items held in trust but declined to order the return or replacement of dynamite or most silencers due to insufficient evidentiary foundation.
Orders were made confirming the return of auxiliary firearm accessories and other seized non‑forfeited property.
