The applicants sought leave to appeal to the Divisional Court from an order dismissing their motion to strike a summons to witness.
The respondent had issued the summons to examine a representative of the applicants in connection with a pending motion under Rule 21.01(1)(a).
The court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding no good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's decision that the evidence was potentially relevant, and concluding that the proposed appeal did not involve matters of general importance.
