2 total
Insurer's reconsideration request dismissed; no error in admitting late evidence or interpreting SABS fee limits.
The respondent insurer requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that granted the applicant entitlement to a partially approved psychological treatment plan for observation and monitoring.
The insurer argued the Tribunal breached procedural fairness by admitting a late-served letter from a psychologist and erred in interpreting section 25 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule regarding a $200 fee limit.
The Tribunal dismissed the reconsideration request, finding no error in its procedural fairness analysis under Rule 9.3 and confirming that the $200 limit applies to the review and approval of an OCF-18, not to the assessments proposed within it.
Appeal from conviction allowed and acquittal entered following Crown concession.
The appellant appealed his conviction by the Ontario Court of Justice.
The Crown conceded that the appeal must be allowed.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and entered an acquittal.
