The respondent insurer requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that granted the applicant entitlement to a partially approved psychological treatment plan for observation and monitoring.
The insurer argued the Tribunal breached procedural fairness by admitting a late-served letter from a psychologist and erred in interpreting section 25 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule regarding a $200 fee limit.
The Tribunal dismissed the reconsideration request, finding no error in its procedural fairness analysis under Rule 9.3 and confirming that the $200 limit applies to the review and approval of an OCF-18, not to the assessments proposed within it.
