The appellant appealed his convictions for two counts of counselling to commit murder against his ex-wife and her boyfriend.
While incarcerated, the appellant agreed to pay an undercover police officer to kill the intended victims.
The appellant argued that the trial judge erred in admitting an audiotape of a telephone conversation under s. 24(2) of the Charter, admitting his police interview under ss. 10(a) and (b), instructing the jury, and dismissing his entrapment motion.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's Charter rulings, jury instructions, or conclusion that the police acted on reasonable suspicion without inducing the offence.
