Danica Maslow

The applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and sought an income replacement benefit (IRB).

The central dispute was whether the applicant was an employee or self-employed at the time of the accident, as he worked part-time as a production worker and also drove for Uber.

The Tribunal found the applicant was an employee at the time of the accident and calculated his IRB based on his gross employment income four weeks prior to the accident.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a weekly IRB of $232.96 for specified periods, plus interest.

The applicant's claim for an award under Regulation 664 for unreasonable delay was dismissed.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that denied funding for catastrophic impairment assessments.

The applicant argued the Tribunal applied the wrong legal test and improperly weighed evidence.

The Vice-Chair dismissed the request, finding that the applicant improperly attempted to introduce new evidence and that the original adjudicator correctly applied the test of whether further investigation was reasonable and necessary.

The request for reconsideration was denied.