This decision involves a sexual assault trial where the accused, Dru Norris, was charged with multiple counts including sexual assault and breaches of release conditions.
The court applied the framework from R. v. D.W. to assess the credibility and reliability of the complainant L.T. and the accused.
The judge found the accused's evidence inconsistent, illogical, and evasive, while accepting the complainant's testimony as credible and reliable.
The accused was found guilty of sexual assault and the breaches of release conditions.
