The defendants successfully moved to discharge two construction liens from their property, while issues regarding the Limitations Act were left to trial.
The court determined costs for the motion.
The court found the defendants were the successful parties, as they succeeded on the bulk of the issues that consumed the most court time.
The court rejected the plaintiff's argument that the defendants should have simply posted bonds, noting that the plaintiff's liens were without merit and the defendants were entitled to seek their removal.
The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendants' costs of $21,253.34 on a partial indemnity basis, with costs for the limitations issue fixed at $3,000 in the cause.