The appellant appealed an order striking the jury and the dismissal of her action.
The court held that appellate review of an order striking a jury is very limited and found that the trial judge considered the relevant factors, applied correct principles, and exercised discretion properly.
The court also upheld the rejection of the medical expert evidence, accepting that the trial judge was entitled to find the opinions were based on incomplete information from the plaintiff and were not presented objectively.
The additional grounds of appeal lacked merit.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
