Following a motion concerning the appropriate income to be used in calculating child support, both parties sought costs.
The dispute arose from the payor’s claim that his present income had decreased and should be used instead of prior income, which would have produced significant arrears.
The court accepted the payor’s position on a temporary basis pending a further review of child support.
Although the issue was important and the argument somewhat novel, the payor was successful on the interim motion.
The court therefore awarded the successful party partial costs reflecting the short duration and limited scope of the motion.