The appellant appealed a zoning by-law amendment passed by the municipality intended to regulate disruptive short-term rentals ('party houses') in low-density residential zones.
The amendment defined 'Commercial Accommodation' as rentals of 28 days or less.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and repealed the by-law, finding it did not represent good planning as it would unintentionally render illegal the benign, traditional practice of renting cottages for 1-2 weeks.
The Tribunal noted the municipality could enforce existing zoning against disruptive commercial operators and that the issue would be better addressed through the upcoming Official Plan review.