The applicant, Roy D'Mello, brought two applications characterized by the court as an unrelenting campaign of stonewalling and delay, weaponizing the Rules of Civil Procedure, and constituting collateral attacks on prior judicial decisions.
The respondent, Chris Jamie Sapusak, brought motions to dismiss these applications.
The court incorporated its earlier reasons for dismissing similar applications against other respondents.
The court found D'Mello's applications disclosed no reasonable cause of action, could not succeed, were frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, and were not authorized under Rule 14.05 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The motions to dismiss D'Mello's applications were granted without leave to amend.
