The appellant appealed a trial judge's order permitting the respondent to relocate with the children to Hamilton.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred in finding the move was a material change in circumstances, that it was not reasonably foreseeable, and that it was in the best interests of the children.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge correctly applied the law, made no palpable and overriding errors, and properly considered all factors regarding the children's best interests.
