The mother appealed a trial decision ordering joint custody, imputing the father's income for child support, and awarding costs to the father.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the joint custody order was a necessary and appropriate response to the mother's severe gatekeeping behaviour, which included unilateral decision-making and false allegations.
The court also upheld the trial judge's imputation of the father's income based on the available evidence, noting that neither party had provided a professional valuation at trial.
Leave to appeal the costs award was denied.
