The plaintiff sued multiple defendants for damages arising from the termination of a commercial sublease for a race shop.
Two defendants, who managed the plaintiff's race car under a separate services agreement, moved for summary judgment to dismiss the claims against them.
The court found that the moving parties were not parties to the sublease and had no obligation under the services agreement to obtain an occupancy permit for the premises.
The court also dismissed the claims for negligent misrepresentation, intentional interference with economic relations, and trespass due to a lack of evidence.
The motion for summary judgment was granted, and the action against the moving parties was dismissed.
