The court determined the costs payable following a motion arising after an earlier order directing the sale of property.
The responding party sought partial indemnity costs of approximately $4,282 for the subsequent motion, while the opposing party argued that only $1,000 was appropriate.
The court held that the conduct of the opposing party after the initial order made the second motion necessary and that the moving party was entitled to costs.
However, the court found the claimed amount excessive for a straightforward matter and assessed partial indemnity costs at approximately 55% of reasonable actual costs.
Costs were fixed at $1,500 inclusive of disbursements and HST.