The parties brought motions concerning custody, access, child support, and equalization.
The respondent sought to set aside a prior consent order withdrawing his claims for spousal support and property.
The court found the consent order binding, noting the respondent was represented by counsel and acknowledged the binding nature of settlement offers.
The respondent's claims for spousal support and property were struck.
The applicant was granted custody of the youngest child, and interim supervised access for the respondent was maintained for the two younger children.
Child support was ordered based on an imputed income for the respondent, and the applicant was to fund a Parenting Capacity Assessment Report with reimbursement from the respondent.
Costs were awarded to the applicant.
