The plaintiffs, a renovation company and its owner, sued the defendant homeowner for an unpaid balance on a renovation contract.
The initial fixed-price contract was later superseded by an oral agreement during a November 2017 meeting due to project delays and disputes.
The court found the plaintiffs' initial estimate and project management lacked diligence, and their claims for extra work were largely unsubstantiated.
However, the court determined that a new oral agreement was reached for a total contract price of $90,000.00, inclusive of labour, material, and HST.
The defendant had paid $65,129.60.
Judgment was awarded to the plaintiff Kyle O’Brien for the remaining balance.
