3 total
Tribunal approves site-specific zoning settlements for three properties under Guelph's new Comprehensive Zoning By-law.
The Tribunal held a settlement hearing concerning three appeals against the City of Guelph's new Comprehensive Zoning By-law.
The appellants reached settlements with the City to establish site-specific zoning provisions for their respective properties, including permissions for office and medical clinic uses, and a mixed-use development.
Relying on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the proposed amendments were consistent with provincial policies, conformed to the official plan, and represented good planning.
The appeals were allowed in part to give effect to the settlements.
Tribunal consolidates zoning and parking by-law appeals and schedules settlement hearing and future CMC.
This was a Case Management Conference regarding appeals of the City of Guelph's new Comprehensive Zoning By-law, related Official Plan updates, and residential parking requirements.
On consent of the parties, the Tribunal consolidated the Parking By-law Appeal with the Comprehensive Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendment appeals.
The Tribunal also scheduled a settlement hearing for April 23, 2024, to address settlements reached with several appellants, and a third Case Management Conference for June 25, 2024.
Tribunal grants motion to partially approve zoning by-law and scope appeals to specific properties.
The City of Guelph brought a motion for directions seeking partial approval of its new Comprehensive Zoning By-law, save and except for certain sections under appeal.
The City also sought to scope the appeals of Industrial Equities Guelph Corporation and Paisley & Whitelaw Inc. to site-specific or area-specific appeals.
The Tribunal granted the motion, finding that the notices of appeal for both respondents only provided reasons related to specific properties and did not justify city-wide appeals.
The Tribunal deemed the unappealed portions of the By-law to be in full force and effect and ordered the respondents to scope their appeals accordingly.
