The appellant appealed his sentence of 12 months' incarceration and two years' probation for multiple offences, including forcible entry, assault causing bodily harm, and uttering death threats.
He argued the sentence was harsh, failed to adequately apply the Gladue analysis, and violated the jump principle.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the sentencing judge's application of Gladue or the jump principle, and concluding the sentence was fit and within the appropriate range.
