The appellants appealed a summary judgment decision finding that the limitation period for the respondent's tort and oppression claims had not expired.
The appellants argued the limitation period began when the respondent knew the corporate defendant vacated the premises and consulted a lawyer.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the motion judge that the respondent did not have, and could not have reasonably discovered, information about the transfer of the corporate defendant's business and contracts to another corporation at that time.
