The applicant police officer sought judicial review of a hearing officer's interlocutory decision refusing to order the production of an unredacted copy of her duty book during a disciplinary proceeding.
The respondent moved to quash the application for prematurity.
The Divisional Court quashed the application, finding no exceptional circumstances to justify interrupting the ongoing administrative process to review a discrete disclosure ruling.
The court also held that the hearing officer should not be named as a party to the proceedings to preserve his objectivity.
