The applicant father brought a motion seeking interim parenting time and joint decision-making responsibility regarding the parties' special needs child.
The respondent mother, who was self-represented, opposed the motion and raised allegations of family violence.
The court found that there was no evidence of risk to the child with the father and that the proposed parenting schedule was in the child's best interests.
The court granted the father's motion for interim parenting time and joint decision-making, ordering no costs due to the mother's limited financial means.
