The appellant tenant appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board summarily rejecting her request for reconsideration of a consent eviction order.
The tenant argued that her mental health issues vitiated her consent and that the Vice Chair erred by deciding the reconsideration on its merits at the screening stage without an evidentiary hearing.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no error of law or denial of procedural fairness, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient information to support a preliminary finding of a serious error as required by the Board's rules.
