The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that denied his claim for income replacement benefits and an award under Regulation 664.
The applicant argued that the adjudicator breached procedural fairness, made errors of fact and law, and that a different adjudicator should hear the reconsideration to avoid an apprehension of bias.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that adjudicators are permitted to reconsider their own decisions, there was no breach of procedural fairness, and no errors of fact or law were made that would have led to a different result.
Specifically, the applicant failed to provide evidence of his pre-accident work experience to satisfy the test under s. 6(2)(b) of the Schedule.
